|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1678
   |
Posted - 2014.08.06 15:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
An excellent devblog Fozzie and overall, i'm very happy with the changes. 
I'm glad that wormholes are finally getting some developer attention but i hope to see some new developer created content soonish (C7 wormholes, wormhole specific deployables, new sleeper tech, etc.) because once we ge used to the hyperion changes in a few months, wormhole activities will largely still be the same as they always have.
One issue not addressed... A lot of us feel that mining sites should be removed from the scan overlay and returned to being probable sites. Will we see this change anytime soon?
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1678
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 15:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Woot woot :) I am super glad the long awaited iterations for wspace are coming! Now lets go and do that feedback!
I assume most of this was brought about by you and james?! If so, well done old friend!
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1685
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 09:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
@ CCP, I don't think Fozzie likes giving feedback on our feedback  could somone pop over to the wormhole feedback threads and let people know you are listening to some of the legitimate concerns?
Personally i think the new mass based jump range for capitals is too extreme and will kill cap fights in wormhole space. Also, the new small mass frigate wormholes will be pretty pointless if it only leads to existing wormhole systems.
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1704
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 08:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
One issue not addressed... A lot of us feel that mining sites should be removed from the scan overlay and returned to being probable sites. Will we see this change anytime soon?
Bump
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1748
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 16:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
For about a year I've been feeling that wormhole space has become stagnant and predictable. I don't have any facts or figures but it feels like there is far less activity in wormhole space these days.
I think that CCP need to do two things to make wormholes interesting again. Firstly they should add "new stuff" only available in wormhole space. This could include new T3 things to manufacture, a new class of wormhole or new types of sleepers (e.g roaming sleepers). This would attract new people to wormholes space and put us on a path to filling the empty systems.
Secondly, they need to add more conflict drivers. At the moment the only conflict drivers in wormhole space are the desire to pad your killboard or a grudge between two forces. K-space has lots of reasons to fight and i think we could do with similar incentives.
After we have gotten used to the mechanic changes in Hyperion, wormhole space is going to be as stagnant as it ever was IMHO. Are we going to have to wait until wormhole space becomes as dead as the low sec of old before we see real improvements?
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
1963
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 16:08:22 -
[6] - Quote
For about a year I've been feeling that wormhole space has become stagnant and predictable. I don't have any facts or figures but it feels like there is far less activity in wormhole space these days.
I think that CCP need to do two things to make wormholes interesting again. Firstly they should add "new stuff" only available in wormhole space. This could include new T3 things to manufacture, a new class of wormhole or new types of sleepers (e.g roaming sleepers). This would attract new people to wormholes space and put us on a path to filling the empty systems.
Secondly, they need to add more conflict drivers. At the moment the only conflict drivers in wormhole space are the desire to pad your killboard or a grudge between two forces. K-space has lots of reasons to fight and i think we could do with similar incentives.
After we have gotten used to the mechanic changes in Hyperion, wormhole space is going to be as stagnant as it ever was IMHO. Are we going to have to wait until wormhole space becomes as dead as the low sec of old before we see real improvements?
+1
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1749
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 19:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ah who am i kidding?! CCP aren't even listening.
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
1963
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 19:15:53 -
[8] - Quote
Ah who am i kidding?! CCP aren't even listening.
+1
|
|
|
| |
|